HomeFrameworksFinancial ServicesAICPA SQMS No.1

Framework  Financial Services

AICPA SQMS No.1

Statement on Quality Management Standards No. 1 is the AICPA standard that tells a CPA firm how to run a firm-wide system of quality management for its accounting and auditing practice.

It replaced the older quality control standard (SQCS No. 8) and moves firms from a fixed checklist of policies to a risk-based model: the firm sets quality objectives, identifies the risks to those objectives, designs responses, and then monitors whether the responses work.

In writing, a firm needs a documented system covering eight components (governance and leadership, the risk assessment process, ethical requirements, client and engagement acceptance, engagement performance, resources, information and communication, and monitoring and remediation), the record of its quality risks and responses, and the annual written evaluation in which the person with ultimate responsibility concludes whether the system provides reasonable assurance.

Firms had to have the system designed and in operation by December 15, 2025, and the first annual evaluation is due within one year of that date.

AI-compiled
Share
Sponsored
Policy  Acknowledgment  Proof
AcknowledgedSQM policies v2by name, on record
Peer Review Readywith AllyMatter
Audit the Auditors the Modern WayYour system of quality management, acknowledged by every professional
01
Approve it, lock the version
Non-author approval, obsolete copies blocked
02
Every partner and staff on record
Who read which version, and when
03
Hand the peer reviewer the trail
From $29/mo, 20 editors, unlimited staff (published)

Who has to comply

Every CPA firm with an accounting or auditing practice under AICPA standards: audits, reviews, compilations, preparation engagements, and attestation engagements. Firm size does not matter; sole practitioners are covered.

What you have to write

Documents on this site that AICPA SQMS No.1 requires or expects, each with who must have it, the review cycle and the obligations that cite it.

What the assessor asks to see

The reviewer asks for the firm's documented system of quality management (objectives, risks, responses), the risk assessment process and how it was updated, monitoring and remediation records, the annual evaluation and conclusion signed by the person with ultimate responsibility, independence and ethics confirmations, acceptance and continuance files, and a sample of engagement files to test that the responses operate in practice.

Where the requirement sits: SQMS No.1 components: governance and leadership, ethical requirements, acceptance/continuance, engagement performance, resources, information and communication, monitoring and remediation; annual evaluation

Key dates

SQMS No. 1 was issued in June 2022. Systems of quality management had to be designed and implemented by December 15, 2025.

The first annual evaluation of the system is due within one year of that date, so by December 15, 2026. Related standards effective at the same time include SQMS No. 2 (engagement quality reviews), SAS No. 146, SSARS No. 26, and SSAE No. 23.

What AllyMatter does here

Holds the documented SQM, proves it was communicated to and acknowledged by personnel, and evidences the annual review cycle.

AllyMatter publishes this site.

Assessors

Who assesses AICPA SQMS No.1

Peer reviewers under the AICPA Peer Review Program (a qualified CPA firm and team captain approved by the program), administered by state CPA societies or the National Peer Review Committee. State boards of accountancy generally require enrollment in peer review as a condition of licensure.

Accredited by AICPA Peer Review Board sets reviewer qualifications and program standards; state boards of accountancy recognize the program for licensure.

Public register of assessors: https://peerreview.aicpa.org/reviewer_search.html

No firm has claimed a AICPA SQMS No.1 assessor listing yet. Claim yours →

Consultants

Who helps with AICPA SQMS No.1

A large practice-management consulting ecosystem exists: state CPA society peer review staff, quality management consultants, and template vendors help firms write the risk assessment, map objectives to responses, and set up monitoring.

Typical engagement shape is a gap analysis against SQCS No. 8, a workshop to draft quality objectives and risks, then a documented system and monitoring plan before the firm's next peer review.

Firms that name this framework in their own material. Listings we have not verified yet come from public filings and partner lists. Each firm can confirm its own.

No firm has claimed a AICPA SQMS No.1 consultant listing yet. Claim yours →

Software

Tools for AICPA SQMS No.1

Tools that name this framework in their own material.

Related reading

  1. Implementing the AICPA's New Quality Management StandardsAcademic and practitioner account of how the risk-based system replaces SQCS No. 8, including the annual evaluation and who can sign it.The CPA Journal
  2. SQMS 1 Explained: A Practical Guide to Firm-Level Quality ManagementWorks through quality objectives, quality risks and responses in order, sized for sole practitioners as well as multi-office firms.Thomson Reuters

Independent third-party explainers, chosen by hand. Not affiliated with this site and not paid placements. All links are nofollow.

Need a hand implementing it?

Find a Consultant for AICPA SQMS No.1

Tell us what you need done and we will point you to firms that do this work. Your details go to a firm only when you choose it.

From the publisher

Run the Policy Side of AICPA SQMS No.1 in AllyMatter

Approve the policies AICPA SQMS No.1 asks for, keep every version, and record a named acknowledgment from each person who has to read them.

See how AllyMatter works From $29/mo, 20 editors, unlimited staff

About this data

Pages on this site are compiled with AI from two or more linked sources, rewritten in our words, and reviewed by people in stages. Each record shows its stage and date. Nothing here is legal, audit or tax advice, and policyandcompliance.com accepts no responsibility for errors or for decisions made on it. Read the source, then decide.
How we compile and verify →

Think something is wrong?

corrections@policyandcompliance.com
Tell us the page and what you found. We check it against the source and fix it.
Corrections log →

Want to advertise here?

ads@policyandcompliance.com
A primary ad and a secondary placement, flat fee. Buying one changes nothing else on the page.